The Melbourne Study
In Melbourne, a unique public study of psychoanalytic psychotherapy was carried out. For two years, people met with their therapists twice a week. Both patients and therapists later gave interviews, describing what helped the therapy move forward — and what made it more difficult.
What helped therapy work
• The very structure of psychoanalytic work. The sessions were not just about talking over problems, but about looking deeper: into unconscious patterns, into links between past and present, into how inner feelings shape relationships. This gave people new ways to understand themselves.
• The therapeutic relationship. Many participants said this was the first time they felt accepted as they were — without judgment or rejection. The steady presence of a therapist gave a sense of safety and support.
• Regularity and rhythm. Meeting twice a week created stability. The frame of therapy — same times, same place, same person — helped people stay engaged and in touch with themselves.
• Personal qualities of therapists. Attentiveness, consistency, genuine interest in the patient’s inner world — all of this made people feel important and encouraged them to open up.
• The role of patients themselves. Change required patience and willingness to stay with the process. Those who could commit to the work noticed the greatest benefit.
What made it harder
• A strict two-year limit. Many felt that this was not enough time. As the end approached, people experienced anxiety and a sense of unfinished business.
• Understanding interpretations. Early on, some explanations seemed too abstract or difficult. Those who hoped for quick solutions or advice often felt disappointed.
• Practical barriers. Money, distance, and time sometimes stood in the way, reminding participants that therapy requires not only inner work but also everyday effort.
Main conclusions
1. Psychoanalytic psychotherapy works. People noticed deep inner changes, and these changes remained even after therapy ended.
2. Relationships and structure matter most. Trust, support, regular meetings, and clear boundaries were key conditions for progress.
3. Flexibility is important. A fixed two-year frame was helpful for some, but painful for others who needed more time.
4. Challenges are part of the process. Disappointment, confusion, and painful feelings did not mean failure. They became stepping stones toward real change.
⸻
This study was one of the first to show that psychoanalytic psychotherapy is not just an exclusive practice for a privileged few. It can also work as a public service, bringing sustainable results and helping many people live more fully.
📌 Note: The original study uses the words “psychoanalytic psychotherapy,” “patients,” and “treatment,” because it was conducted in the context of licensed clinical work in Australia. In my own practice, I work within a psychoanalytic approach, offering psychological support and consulting.